Confronting Mental Health Evidence: A Practical PLAN to Examine Reliability and Experts in Family Law, Second Edition

Confronting Mental Health Evidence: A Practical PLAN to Examine Reliability and Experts in Family Law, Second Edition

  • ISBN: 9781634252119
Author(s):
Sponsor(s):
Publisher(s):

ISBN: 978-1-63425-211-9
Product Code: 5130210
2015, 297 pages, 7 x 10, Paperback

This book describes and applies the practical four-step PLAN Model, based in caselaw and professional psychology's literature to help lawyers organize, critique, and use psychological materials and testimony when examining experts and framing legal arguments.

Additional Information
  • List Price: $99.95
  • ABA Member Price: $89.95
  • Sponsor Member Price: $89.95

 
Want to save more?
Log into see if you qualify for a lower rate.
Would you like to qualify for a lower rate?
Members
save $10.00 or more
Because you are a member, you are able to save on this order!
 
Deeper Discount
Joining the ABA and a sponsoring entity will give you even more savings.
Item Details:

Confronting Mental Health Evidence—Second Edition describes and applies the four-step PLAN Model to help lawyers organize, critique, and use psychological materials and testimony when examining experts and framing legal arguments.

This Second Edition refreshes previous topics, including...
View More View Less
Frequently bought together:
You might also like:
People who bought this also bought:
Product Reviews 5 out of 5  (2 Reviews)
Sort By:
select
1 - 2 of 2
select
1
David C Sarnacki Oct 25, 2015 Report Abuse
I was a big fan of the first edition and am happy to see the addition of nearly 100 pages in this second edition. If there’s one thing you’ll learn from John Zervopoulos in his newly published, second edition, Confronting Mental Health Evidence, it’s: “How do you know what you say you know?” That key question is Zervopoulos’ tool for evaluating mental health reports and testimony. Zervopoulos brings his experience as both a psychologist and a lawyer to the challenges mental health experts present in court. He advises repeatedly that the simplest and best way to evaluate mental health professionals, their methods, their supporting materials, and their conclusions is that question: “How do you know what you say you know?” Zervopoulos presents a thorough yet practical approach to understanding the intersection of psychology and family law. His book is educational, analytical and useful. It provides a solid introduction to the mental health profession. It delves into the Frye-Daubert arena of evidence. And it provides an immediate application to your family law cases. There are paragraphs that can be transformed into themes and theories for your opening statements and closing arguments. There are topics that can provide a structure for a persuasive direct examination. And there are significant points to be made on your cross examination. Zervopoulos’s 297-page book subdivides into three parts: (1) three critical perspectives; (2) exposing analytical gaps; and (3) obtaining mental health records. Part One of Confronting Mental Health Evidence focuses on three critical perspectives that we must understand as we deal with mental health issues and testimony. In Part Two, Zervopoulos focuses on exposing analytical gaps and applying a scientific–critical thinking mindset. Finally, in Part Three, Zervopoulos shows how to obtain mental health records. David C. Sarnacki practices family law, mediation and collaborative divorce in Grand Rapids, Michigan. He is a past Chai
David C Sarnacki Oct 25, 2015 Report Abuse
I was a big fan of the first edition and am happy to see the addition of nearly 100 pages in this second edition. If there’s one thing you’ll learn from John Zervopoulos in his newly published, second edition, Confronting Mental Health Evidence, it’s: “How do you know what you say you know?” That key question is Zervopoulos’ tool for evaluating mental health reports and testimony. Zervopoulos brings his experience as both a psychologist and a lawyer to the challenges mental health experts present in court. He advises repeatedly that the simplest and best way to evaluate mental health professionals, their methods, their supporting materials, and their conclusions is that question: “How do you know what you say you know?” Zervopoulos presents a thorough yet practical approach to understanding the intersection of psychology and family law. His book is educational, analytical and useful. It provides a solid introduction to the mental health profession. It delves into the Frye-Daubert arena of evidence. And it provides an immediate application to your family law cases. There are paragraphs that can be transformed into themes and theories for your opening statements and closing arguments. There are topics that can provide a structure for a persuasive direct examination. And there are significant points to be made on your cross examination. Zervopoulos’s 297-page book subdivides into three parts: (1) three critical perspectives; (2) exposing analytical gaps; and (3) obtaining mental health records. Part One of Confronting Mental Health Evidence focuses on three critical perspectives that we must understand as we deal with mental health issues and testimony. The emotional perspective focuses on family dynamics. The emotional effects of the divorce are explained through three “keys.” The first key is recognizing the “His” and “Her” marriages within the marriage. The second key is understanding the events surrounding the couple’s separation and filing for divorce. The th
Sort By:
select
1 - 2 of 2
select
1

0

0

0